More tools
Use cases
Most science influencer marketing advice stops at "work with micro-influencers" and "be authentic". We wanted to see what the biggest science brands actually do, so we pulled the 50 most recent sponsored posts for each of the most-searched science brands in the US and looked at who posted, how each deal was disclosed, and which posts took off.
Here's why science brands work with creators, the commonalities in their strategy, and a step-by-step way to run your own campaign.
Creators do a few things for science brands that ads and product pages can't:
These are the most-searched science brands in the US, according to Ahrefs. Deal types show how each post was disclosed (for example, with a paid partnership label or an ambassador hashtag). Creator tiers: micro 10k–50k followers, mid-tier 50k–500k, macro 500k+.
| Brand | What they sell | Most common deal type | Typical creator size | Signature tactic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Geographic | Magazines, kids subscriptions and nature shows | Paid | Mid-tier | A cohort of science and nature creators |
| KiwiCo | STEM project kits and kids subscription crates | Paid | Mid-tier | Parents filming kids with its subscription crates |
| Brilliant | Interactive STEM learning app | Paid | Not listed (YouTube) | Science YouTubers reading one standing offer |
12 of Nat Geo's last 50 sponsored posts carry #NatGeoCollab, mostly from its first Creator Cohort, a group of creators who post about geology, archaeology and animals. Another 19 promote its shows on Disney+ and Hulu, from Limitless with Chris Hemsworth to Epic Food Journeys. Its creators are based in the US (22), the UK (4) and Canada (3), 47 posts were disclosed as paid partnerships, and none use a code.

What to take from it: Sell curiosity, not the product. @sophia__renee pitched a Nat Geo Kids subscription as "the gift of curiosity instead of toys", and the post got 909k plays from a creator with 176k followers.
KiwiCo's last 49 sponsored posts split between two ages: 22 push its Panda Crate for babies and toddlers, while others show older kids building STEM projects. 9 posts include a code, usually for 50% off a first crate, and 2 announced it's now sold at Target. 33 of its creators are in the US.

What to take from it: Show the kid building it, then using it. @lets_create_and_celebrate's daughter built a motion-sensing spider from a KiwiCo crate and used it to prank her brother, and the post got 683k plays from a creator with 19k followers.
All of Brilliant's last 47 sponsored posts are YouTube videos, mostly from science, engineering and coding channels like Sabine Hossenfelder, Scott Manley and The B1M. Nearly every one reads the same offer: 45 give 20% off an annual Premium subscription, and 39 add a 30-day free trial. 46 were disclosed as paid partnerships, and none use a discount code.

What to take from it: Sponsor creators whose own projects show the skills you teach. @StuffMadeHere read Brilliant's offer in a video about building an autocorrecting mini golf club, and it got 156k likes, the most on Brilliant's page.
Looking across all 146 posts, four patterns stand out:
Here's how to run a campaign step by step, using what the top science brands do at each stage.
Decide what the campaign is for before you pick a single creator, because the goal changes who you book, how you pay them and what you ask them to post. The top science brands' posts show both goals at work. KiwiCo's first-crate discounts and Brilliant's free trials are built to drive sign-ups that week. Nat Geo's creator cohort and its Disney+ show posts are built for reach.
Pick one metric per campaign so you can compare creators fairly afterwards.
Follower count is the last thing to filter on. A creator with 15k followers asking parents whether they'd rather give "another gift card at the next birthday" or a KiwiCo crate got 1.3M plays, because their followers are parents shopping for kids' gifts. On Instagram, creators under 50k followers got about three and a half times the likes relative to their audience.
Our survey found niche micro-creators are outperforming mega-influencers: nearly 60% of marketers said niche influencers performed better in 2025 than in 2024.

You can also find science influencers for free, for example by searching the hashtags your buyers follow.
The top science brands pay per post. Nat Geo, KiwiCo and Brilliant disclosed 47, 44 and 46 of their posts as paid partnerships, and none of them used affiliate deals at scale.
Commission-only is getting harder to sell, though. Over 23% of marketers in our survey said creators would take performance pay only if a flat fee came with it. If you run tiers, the average commission tiers in our affiliate research were 10%, 14% and 19%, and brands with more than one tier had more active affiliates.
The captions from the top science brands point to three formats that carry most of their creator content:
Whatever the format, check every science claim with the creator before it goes live, and ask them to show what's inside the kit or lesson on screen.
The top science brands lead with a first-order offer instead of a code. Brilliant pointed viewers to a link with a free trial, and 9 of KiwiCo's posts offer 50% off a first crate. Nat Geo used no codes at all.
Codes also leak. In our affiliate marketing research, 47.6% of marketers said they struggle with code poaching, where a creator's code ends up on coupon sites.
In Modash, each creator gets a tracked link and a code tied to your Shopify data, so sales from DMs, bios and stories all count toward the right person. Commission is calculated on net revenue after refunds and returns.

The top science brands rebook some creators: 25 of their 109 creators posted more than once. Nat Geo's Creator Cohort members came back for Earth Month a few weeks after their first posts. In science, a creator who keeps teaching on camera builds the trust that makes a learning product worth paying for.
Most marketers want to do more of this. In our influencer marketing trends survey, over 60% said they plan to invest more in long-term partnerships, but only 54% actually ran more of them last year.
The top brands avoid a few mistakes that trip up smaller programs:
It depends on platform, following and engagement. Micro-influencers often work for free product plus a fee in the low hundreds per post, or an affiliate commission. Larger creators charge more. Many brands start with gifting plus commission to test fit before committing to flat fees. To estimate what a specific creator is likely to charge, drop their handle into our free Instagram influencer pricing calculator.
Instagram carries most science creator work, and 99 of the 146 sponsored posts we analyzed for the most-searched science brands ran there. YouTube matters too: all 47 of Brilliant's posts were YouTube sponsorships, and in our survey, marketers rated TikTok videos the highest-performing deliverable (53.2%).
National Geographic, KiwiCo and Brilliant are the most-searched science brands in the US, and all of them run active creator programs. See the breakdown above for who each one works with.
It depends on your goal. A launch chasing awareness leans bigger, a conversion play leans smaller and more trusted. In the science posts we analyzed, creators under 50k followers got about three and a half times the likes relative to their audience size, so most brands should build their base with micro-influencers (10k–50k followers) and add bigger names for launches.
Track sales per creator with unique links and codes, then compare revenue against what you paid (fees, product and commission). Our engagement rate calculator and fake follower checker help you vet creators before you spend, and our guide to influencer marketing ROI covers the full calculation.
Find creators, manage relationships, pay them in 180+ countries and 36 currencies, and track every sale through Shopify – all in one place, with no fees taken out of creators' pay. Try Modash free, no credit card required – or browse the top science influencers to see who's already out there.